ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
MARM: a framework for malignancy risk prediction from host-derived CNV in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid mNGS data with microbial admixture.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification and risk assessment of malignancy are essential for improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) data contain both microbial and host-derived signals, and a key challenge in extending such data to tumor-associated applications is the robust extraction of host features with discriminative value for malignancy from this complex, admixed background. To address this problem, we developed MARM, a malignancy risk prediction method centered on host-derived copy number variation (CNV). Using host-derived reads from BALF mNGS data, MARM performs genome-wide window-based coverage quantification, normalization and bias correction, reference baseline construction, and principal component-based denoising to derive window-level CNV features for malignancy risk modeling. In addition, a pseudo-label-based extension strategy was introduced to incorporate weakly labeled samples through high-confidence screening, and the performance of XGBoost, Random Forest, and generalized linear models (GLM) was systematically evaluated using CNV features, microbial features, and combined features. Models built on host-derived CNV features consistently outperformed those based on microbial features and achieved performance comparable to combined-feature models, while joint modeling did not provide a stable additional benefit. These findings indicate that, under the current data setting and feature construction strategy, CNV represents a more stable and informative discriminative signal than microbial features. Among the evaluated classifiers, XGBoost showed the best compatibility with window-level CNV features and outperformed Random Forest and GLM overall. On the independent validation set, the pseudo-label-enhanced MARM achieved the best overall performance, with a sensitivity of 0.686, specificity of 0.975, accuracy of 0.847, and Youden index of 0.671. By contrast, microbial features did not show stable independent discriminative ability, and combined modeling did not yield clear or sustained performance gains. Together, these results indicate that, in microbially admixed BALF mNGS data, host-derived CNV is more suitable than the evaluated microbial features as the core modeling signal for malignancy risk prediction. MARM provides a new methodological framework for malignancy prediction in complex clinical samples and offers a reference for deeper exploitation of host-derived signals in mNGS data and related auxiliary diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.