ArticleChemical science2026
PpF: a density functional fine-tuned for noncovalent interactions of protein and peptide residues.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The essence of protein-peptide interactions lies in the noncovalent interactions between amino-acid pairs; accurately calculating interaction energies of these pairs is crucial for modelling the tertiary structure and protein-peptide interactions. However, available functionals for density functional theory have insufficient accuracy for many noncovalent interactions. To address this challenge, we developed a new functional called PpF by starting with the broadly trained CF22D model as a foundation model and fine tuning it by using it with more specific data on interactions of capped amino acids. The PpF model is specifically designed for noncovalent interactions of pairs of amino acids. First, based on the LEADS-PEP dataset for assessing peptide docking performance, we constructed the amino-acid pair structures dataset (called AAPS260) containing 260 pairs of noncovalently interacting capped amino acids, from which we selected 36 representatives. We performed DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations on these pairs to determine reference energies for a new training dataset with 12 interaction energies and a new testing dataset with 24 interaction energies. We used an iterative supervised training strategy to optimize parameters for an exchange-correlation functional with a damped dispersion term; the loss function involves 89 previously defined datasets augmented by the new training dataset (AAIE12) with a performance-triggered determination of its weight. This produces the PpF functional. We find that the PpF functional outperforms other functionals on the training set (AAIE12), test set (AAIE24) and the Side Chain Atlas of Interactions (SCAI) dataset. It also does very well on the JSCH, GMTKN55, and MGCDB84_NC databases. The PpF functional is then used to establish the Amino-Acid Interaction Energy benchmark dataset, which is called AAIE260. This work produces a new density functional, a structural dataset of pairs of capped amino acids, a benchmark dataset of the interaction energies of these pairs, and a reliable computational method for exploring protein-peptide binding mechanisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.