Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254475›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2026

Gender, indigeneity, and intersectional considerations; The mental health of frontline public safety and healthcare workers in Canada.

Lindsay P Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lindsay P AllenCommunity Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 221 Human Ecology Bldg., Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There are high prevalences of PTSD and suicide in frontline professional emergency responders; currently in Canada, every two out of three of such frontline workers are suffering at least one mental disorder. Beyond individual psychoeducation, gender and intersectional considerations must be addressed to better support mental health of these workers. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted over Zoom with 41 frontlines workers from across Canada. Theoretical sampling and inductive analysis led to a focus on the experiences of minorities, namely, women and Indigenous participants. Results: The key findings include that the workforce lacks diversity; women face a double- or triple-bind; gender-based bullying and harassment continue to be a problem; gender-based mental health stigma persists; there are issues with male peer supporters who lack gender-based understanding; a cultural of machoism persists; there are good in-roads for Indigenous spirituality and inclusion in therapy; Indigenous Elders' teachings and presence in the workplace are therapeutic; and there are special considerations when working in small communities. Conclusions: Addressing behavioural and institutional barriers to minority mental wellness must become priorities if frontline organizations seek sustainable recruitment and retention among equity-deserving populations.

Indexed as

Indigenous healthMinority stressProfessional emergency respondersPsychological stressWomen's healthWorkforce diversity

Identifiers

PMID42254475
PMCPMC13233608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.