Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Application of deep learning methods in the classification of normal and pneumonia lung images.

Mehmet Kabak, Mehmet Tarık Baran, Barış Çil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehmet KabakDepartment of Chest Disease, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Türkiye.
Mehmet Tarık BaranDepartment of General Surgery and Artificial Intelligence, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Türkiye.
Barış ÇilDepartment of Chest Disease, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Mardin, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in vulnerable populations. Rapid and accurate diagnosis through chest radiographs is essential, but manual interpretation can be subjective and time-consuming. This study aims to develop and evaluate deep learning-based models for the automated classification of chest X-ray images into normal and pneumonia categories, providing a foundation for a clinical decision support system. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 500 posterior-anterior chest X-rays (PA) from 2024 was used. Images were preprocessed and resized to 224 × 224 pixels. Four pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures-VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and Xception-were fine-tuned using transfer learning. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Among the tested models, VGG16 achieved the highest test accuracy (87.1%) and AUC (0.92), demonstrating strong generalization and classification performance. InceptionV3 also performed well with 85.0% accuracy and AUC of 0.84. The Xception model reached an accuracy of 81.8% (AUC: 0.82) but showed low sensitivity in detecting pneumonia cases. ResNet50 underperformed with an accuracy of 74.2% and AUC of 0.81, likely due to class imbalance and overfitting. Conclusion: VGG16 and InceptionV3 demonstrated high potential for supporting pneumonia diagnosis in chest X-rays. Future research with larger, balanced, and multi-center datasets is needed to improve sensitivity and enhance clinical applicability.

Indexed as

chest X-raydeep learningInceptionV3pneumoniaVGG16

Identifiers

PMID42254413
PMCPMC13233686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.