ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Integrating AI into undergraduate medical education: an exploration of learner-centered approaches through AI.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to enrich medical education by supporting self-directed learning, providing personalized feedback, and simulating clinical and scientific reasoning. Although AI use has expanded in graduate medical education for clinical decision training and administrative support, its effectiveness in undergraduate medical education remains insufficiently established. Empirical data examining how AI instruction influences academic performance, knowledge consolidation, engagement, and critical thinking are limited. This study evaluated whether incorporating AI-patient-based simulations into classroom activities enhances learning outcomes and student experience within an integrated osteopathic medical school curriculum. Methods: Using a mixed-methods survey design, quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed to examine students' perceptions of faculty-developed AI-patient-based simulations integrated into classroom instruction. Results: Students reported that AI-patient-based simulations supported engagement, reinforced learning, and facilitated application of clinical reasoning concepts. Qualitative findings suggested that the simulations promoted active participation and encouraged self-directed learning while highlighting the importance of faculty guidance in interpreting AI-generated content. Discussion: Overall, findings suggest that AI-patient-based simulations can provide meaningful support to medical student learning when thoughtfully integrated into the curriculum and accompanied by explicit instruction regarding limitations, ethical considerations, and responsible AI use. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of AI-assisted instruction on academic performance and critical thinking development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.