Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

The overlooked role of the seminovaginal microbiota in infertility: a narrative mini review.

Charlotte Storck-Thy, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt, Rie Jønsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte Storck-ThyDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Karen Angeliki KrogfeltDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Rie JønssonDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility affects up to 15% of couples worldwide and is influenced by complex biological, immunological, and environmental factors. While reproductive microbiome research has expanded rapidly, the majority of published studies remain largely descriptive, focusing on taxonomic profiling rather than functional or mechanistic insight. Findings from vaginal microbiome studies have been heterogeneous and strongly influenced by methodological variation, and the male genital microbiome has received comparatively less attention, particularly in a couple context. This narrative mini review provides a synthesis of studies investigating paired male and female reproductive microbiomes, emphasizing observational evidence of partner- associated microbial patterns in relation to fertility outcomes. The term 'seminovaginal' microbiota is discussed as a hypothesis describing the transient and dynamic interface arising during sexual activity. Current evidence is limited, largely associative, and constrained by insufficient standardization of sampling, sample handling and processing, data analysis, restricting causal interpretation. Addressing these gaps through coupled, longitudinal, and mechanistic study designs is essential for advancing biologically meaningful conclusions in infertility research and reproductive treatments.

Indexed as

fertilityinfertilitymicrobiotasemenvaginal

Identifiers

PMID42254377
PMCPMC13237698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.