SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of different curcumin formulations in osteoarthritis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of diverse curcumin formulations in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The objective is to assess curcumin's therapeutic potential and inform future formulation development. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE up to September 2025 to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating curcumin for OA (requiring at least one randomized controlled trial). Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Due to limited data and substantial heterogeneity in formulations and study designs, findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Ten meta-analyses and systematic reviews were included. Curcumin formulations exhibited significant improvements in pain (VAS) and joint function/stiffness (WOMAC), showing efficacy signals comparable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and a more favorable tolerability profile in the available studies. However, methodological and clinical heterogeneity was substantial (AMSTAR-2 rated only three studies as high quality). Variations in curcumin composition, bioavailability-enhancing strategies, and extraction methods, coupled with the absence of direct comparative analyses among formulations, precluded definitive inter-group comparisons. Conclusion: Curcumin-based interventions show promise for OA symptom management, with efficacy signals comparable to NSAIDs and appear to have a more favorable tolerability profile in the available studies, while addressing bioavailability challenges. Nevertheless, pronounced heterogeneity and the lack of head-to-head comparative studies, and incomplete safety reporting across reviews preclude definitive conclusions regarding superiority over NSAIDs or optimal formulations, and formulation-specific inferences remain limited. Future research should prioritize high-quality comparative trials or network meta-analyses to confirm efficacy signals and enable formulation-specific inferences. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251172722.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.