ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Efficacy of pan-computed tomography scan in trauma patients presenting in the emergency department of a tertiary care center: an observational study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of pan-computed tomography (pan-CT) in trauma care has gained widespread popularity due to its ability to identify life-threatening multi-system injuries. However, concerns remain regarding its liberal use, radiation exposure, and cost-effectiveness, especially in the absence of clear clinical indications. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care center from May 2023 to April 2025. Records of 313 trauma patients who underwent pan-CT in the emergency department were analyzed. Pan-CT scans were divided into five anatomical zones, and findings were classified as major or minor injuries. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was used to stratify patients into ISS <16 and Results: Among 313 patients, 257 (82.1%) had positive findings in at least one body region, 166 (53.03%) in two or more regions, and 56 (17.89%) in three or more regions. Emergency interventions were required in 14.4% of patients, and 10.9% underwent additional contrast-enhanced scans. Patients with ISS Conclusion: Pan-CT scans demonstrated high positivity rates, especially in patients with ISS >16 and injuries to the head and chest. While effective in detecting injuries, the clinical utility must be balanced with judicious use, and further studies are warranted to establish standardized indications for pan-CT in trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.