ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Evaluating the effects of sacubitril/valsartan with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) continues to be a leading cause of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality worldwide, posing an ongoing clinical and public health burden. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) remain integral to guideline-recommended therapy following STEMI, recent evidence indicates that sacubitril/valsartan may offer superior cardioprotective benefits. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus ACEIs in the management of patients with STEMI. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sacubitril/valsartan and ACEIs in patients with STEMI. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A Results: A total of five RCTs comprising 4915 participants were included in the final analysis. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [RR: 0.66 (0.50, 0.86); Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan therapy significantly reduces MACE and HHF and improves LVEF in patients with STEMI, without increasing the risk of adverse safety outcomes. Future well-powered randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and support clinical guideline recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.