ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Targeting IL-31RA with nemolizumab in prurigo nodularis: a systematic review, GRADE-assessed meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic, intensely itchy skin condition linked to immune and nerve dysfunction, often affecting individuals with darker skin. It severely impacts quality of life. While traditional treatments are limited, nemolizumab shows promise. However, more diverse and long-term studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, analyzing studies on nemolizumab for PN. Data from multiple databases were assessed for efficacy, safety, and bias. Statistical analysis used Review Manager 5.4 with random-effects modeling and heterogeneity evaluation. Results: This meta-analysis included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 859 participants. Nemolizumab significantly improved Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS; ≥4 points) in weeks 4 and 16 [risk ratio (RR): 5.87 and 3.52], and PP-NRS <2 (RR: 11.87 and 5.63). It also improved the Sleep Disturbance and Numerical Rationg Scale (SD-NRS) and Investigator's Global Assessment responses. Adverse events were slightly higher (RR: 1.13), though injection reactions, infections, headaches, and gastrointestinal events showed no significant differences. The risk of neurodermatitis was significantly lower with nemolizumab. Trial Sequential Analysis suggests that further large RCTs should be carried out to validate our results. Conclusion: This review confirms nemolizumab as an effective, well-tolerated treatment for PN, providing rapid relief from itching, skin lesions, and sleep issues. With a favorable safety profile, it marks a major advancement in managing this challenging, underserved condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.