ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Comminuted fracture managed by Universal Mini External (UMEX) fixator: a case report of two cases and a narrative literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple protocols for care and management of closed and open fractures exist, among which the Universal Mini External (UMEX) fixator offers a versatile and cost-effective option for stabilization in complex distal limb fractures. The prognosis of fractures of the distal radius and metatarsals is evaluated under the earliest possible mobilization, rapid recovery, and desired reduction. Factors like type of injury, smoking, and type and period of intervention can have substantial effects on the successful treatment of patients. Case presentation: Two cases were successfully managed using the UMEX fixators. The case of a 35-year-old woman with a comminuted distal radius fracture was managed with the fixator, showing progressive restoration of her range of motion over a 7-week follow-up. The second case, a 32-year-old male smoker with a Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIA fracture of the first metatarsal, was stabilized using the fixator following thorough debridement. The patient achieved full weight-bearing by 3 months postoperatively without complications, and radiological union was confirmed. Discussion: Both cases positively responded to the treatment plan and care. The fixator's modularity and reusability contributed to reduced costs, making it suitable in the limited setting. The fixators provided with functional support and immediate return of mobility with rapid healing and excellent patient satisfaction, supporting UMEX's superiority. Conclusion: The UMEX fixator is effective for managing comminuted and open fractures, offering good outcomes in both upper and lower limb trauma. Its simplicity, cost-efficiency, and effectiveness make it particularly valuable in low-resource orthopedic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.