ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Comparison of crystalloid preloading and co-loading for the prevention of spinal induced-hypotension in elective cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical appraisal of crystalloid preloading and co-loading strategies for prevention of spinal-induced hypotension in cesarean delivery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In this study, we assessed the effect of crystalloid preloading versus co-loading on the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Method: An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 90 participants were divided into three groups: 30 participants in preload group (G1) given 1000 ml of normal saline 15 minutes before spinal anesthesia, 30 participants in co-load group (G2) given 1000 ml of normal saline fluid within 15 minutes together with spinal anesthesia, and 30 participants in the control group (G3) who were not given preloading or co-loading fluids. Statistical analysis for the differences among the three groups was analyzed using a repeated measure multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test. The Bonferonni Result: In the current study, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure significantly decreased among the control groups compared with the co-load and preload groups, Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, crystalloid fluid co-loading is more effective in reducing the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia, reducing the need for a vasopressor and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section parturients compared with preloading crystalloid fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.