Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254111›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Artificial intelligence models for survival prediction in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of time-to-event approaches.

Abdulrahman Ali H Alshamrani, Khalid Abdullah Alghamdi, Mohammed Faisal Alshahrani, Tariq Mohammed S Bin Ladnah, Abdullah Zafer Alshihri, Khalid Ali Bakri, Mohammed Mesfer Alqarni, Tasnim Mansour H Abu Shaqah, Zafer Ali Alshahrani, Afnan Meshal H Alotaibi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Abdulrahman Ali H AlshamraniDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Abdullah AlghamdiDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Faisal AlshahraniDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq Mohammed S Bin LadnahDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Zafer AlshihriDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Ali BakriDepartment of General Surgery, Aseer Central Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Mesfer AlqarniDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Tasnim Mansour H Abu ShaqahDepartment of General Surgery, Aseer Central Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Zafer Ali AlshahraniDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan Meshal H AlotaibiDepartment of General Surgery, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Sultan Al-HufayyanDepartment of General Surgery, Aseer Central Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Lamar Tariq AlassiryCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Feras Ibrahim A AlshehriCollege of Medicine, Batterjee Medical College, Asir, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Al-AzabFaculty of Medicine, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0430-9767
Saad Dhafer AlshahraniDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with marked heterogeneity in patient survival. Conventional clinicopathologic staging provides limited individualized prognostic information. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods have enabled survival-aware modeling approaches that integrate complex clinical, imaging, and molecular data to improve time-to-event survival prediction. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on AI-based models for survival prediction in CRC. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were included if they applied AI methods to model time-to-event survival outcomes in CRC. Records were independently screened, data were extracted, and risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the PROBAST + AI tool. Results: Eight retrospective cohort studies published between 2021 and 2025, encompassing 11 811 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The included studies evaluated diverse data modalities, including clinical variables, radiomics, histopathology, transcriptomics, and genomics. Model performance was moderate to high, with concordance index values ranging from approximately 0.70 to 0.85. All studies demonstrated effective risk stratification of patients into distinct survival groups. Models incorporating high-dimensional imaging or molecular data generally outperformed those based on clinical variables alone. The overall risk of bias was low to unclear, with no study rated as high risk. Conclusion: AI-based time-to-event survival models demonstrate potential prognostic value for prognostic stratification in CRC. Further prospective studies, standardized reporting, and external validation are required to support clinical translation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolorectal cancermachine learningsurvival analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42254111
PMCPMC13236195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.