ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Midline sequestrectomy for far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a case series and technique description.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) accounts for a small proportion of lumbar disc pathologies and often requires surgical intervention when conservative management fails. Although minimally invasive tubular approaches are widely adopted, access to advanced microsurgical equipment remains limited in many centers. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes and feasibility of midline fragment-only sequestrectomy for FLLDH in a resource-limited setting. Methods: This retrospective single-surgeon case series included 35 patients with MRI-confirmed FLLDH treated by midline fragment-only sequestrectomy between 2018 and 2023. Patients with persistent radicular leg pain refractory to conservative treatment for at least 3 weeks and without spinal instability were included, whereas those with prior lumbar surgery, infection, or malignancy were excluded. All procedures were performed through a midline incision under microscopic visualization, using limited bone removal without formal hemilaminectomy or facetectomy to access the far lateral zone. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up, and the Macnab criteria at final follow-up. Pre- and postoperative VAS scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The mean age was 45 years (range: 30-60). Herniation levels were identified as follows: L2-L3 (2.8%), L3-L4 (14.3%), L4-L5 (68.6%), and L5-S1 (14.3%). The mean operative time was 30 ± 10 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 40 ± 10 ml. All patients were discharged within 16 hours post-surgery. During the 24-month follow-up period, no recurrences or instability were observed. At the final follow-up, 82.8% of the patients reported excellent outcomes, while 17.2% reported good outcomes. Conclusion: Midline sequestrectomy yields favorable short- and long-term outcomes consistent with previously reported series and is a safe, cost-effective option in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.