Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254053›Full record

ArticlePolymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.)2025

Thermal Post-Processing of 3D-Printed Poly(glycerol dodecanedioate) Controls Mechanics and Shape Memory Properties.

Ryan Akman, Harsha Ramaraju, Maximillian Hollister, Adam Verga, Scott J Hollister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospects of Four-Dimensional Printing of Polymers for Biomedical Engineering.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan AkmanWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4527-8981
Harsha RamarajuWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Maximillian HollisterWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Adam VergaWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-0408
Scott J HollisterWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 313 Ferst Dr. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the clinic, patients largely prefer treatment via minimally invasive procedures (MIS). This patient preference has led to increased interest in the use of shape memory polymers (SMP) for the development of medical devices that can be delivered via MIS. Acrylated poly-(glycerol-dodecanedioate) (APGD) is a biodegradable SMP that shows promise for use in MIS procedures. APGD can be 3D printed using both material extrusion (ME) and vat photopolymerization (VP) printing modalities; however, differences were measured between APGD samples' physical, mechanical, and shape memory properties. This work looks to characterize the effects of thermal post-processing on 3D printed APGD and to determine whether thermal post-processing is able to reduce these differences in APGD properties due to manufacture modality. Differences in melt transition (

Indexed as

biofabricationbiomaterialspolymerregenerative medicineshape memorytissue engineeringvat photopolymerization

Identifiers

PMID42254053
PMCPMC13052605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.