ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Efficacy and safety of telitacicept as an add-on therapy for relapsing lupus nephritis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept addition to standard therapy in adults with relapsing lupus nephritis (LN). Methods: From 2021 to 2024, patients with relapsing LN were identified and divided into two groups based on telitacicept administration. Laboratory indicators, renal remission status, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores, glucocorticoid dosages, and the incidence of renal flares were evaluated. Multivariate regression was used to assess the baseline predictors of complete renal remission (CRR) and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: Compared to the standard therapy group (n=20), the proportion of patients who achieved a CRR and the primary efficacy renal response were significantly increased in the telitacicept group (n=20) at 6, 9, and 12 months, while the reduction rates of 24-hour urinary protein from baseline at 1, 3, and 9 months were significantly higher. The telitacicept group showed notable improvement in treatment responses in the median SLEDAI-2K score and glucocorticoid dose. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that add-on telitacicept was associated with achieving early CRR. At the end of the follow-up period, the cumulative relapse rate in the telitacicept group was significantly lower than that in the standard treatment group, with no increase in the incidence of AEs. Conclusions: As an add-on therapy, telitacicept is associated with early disease remission in patients with relapsing LN with reduced disease activity, lower glucocorticoid dosage, and fewer relapses. It also showed a favorable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.