ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency: real-world clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1INH) is a rare bradykinin-mediated condition that may mimic hereditary angioedema (HAE). Management is largely extrapolated from HAE data. Therefore, retrospective observations in AAE-C1INH are particularly valuable for informing future approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, underlying conditions, and treatment outcomes of patients with AAE-C1INH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with AAE-C1INH, with a comprehensive review of demographic and clinical features. Results: Among 587 patients with recurrent angioedema, 1.7% had AAE-C1INH. Median onset age was 56.5 years (45.5-66.75), median follow-up was 60.5 months (23.25-66.5), and 20% were female. Clonal hematologic neoplasms were present in 60% of patients and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in 30%, with angioedema preceding the diagnosis of the underlying condition in 60% of cases. Long-term prophylaxis was required in 50% of patients. Antifibrinolytic agents showed limited efficacy, whereas attenuated androgens were associated with a marked reduction in attack frequency. Rituximab-based therapy effectively controlled angioedema, although relapse occurred during extended follow-up. Complete remission under Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition was observed despite persistently low complement levels; however, concurrent withdrawal of renin-angiotensin system blockers represents a potential confounder. Complement levels were observed to parallel treatment response in most patients, whereas this association was not observed in the patient receiving a BTK inhibitor. Conclusion: In this rare, well-characterized cohort with extended follow-up, angioedema frequently represented the earliest clinical manifestation of AAE-C1INH, preceding recognition of the underlying disorder. Antifibrinolytic prophylaxis showed limited benefit, whereas attenuated androgens were associated with reduced attack frequency. Furthermore, therapies targeting the underlying lymphoproliferative condition, including rituximab-based regimens and BTK inhibition, were associated with meaningful clinical benefit. These findings support an individualized, etiology-driven management approach and provide practical insights for clinicians managing this rare condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.