ArticleMedComm2026
From 2D to 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Breast Cancer Model: A Comparative Study of Proliferation, Tissue Structure, and mTOR Signaling.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting offers a suitable in vitro preclinical model system to reduce or replace animal experiments; however, published studies are difficult to compare. In this study, we characterized growth dynamics, tissue architecture, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activity in a 3D bioprinted breast carcinoma model of T47D cell line and compared these features with conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures. Tissue-mimetic structures (TMSs) were generated by 3D bioprinting and analyzed for cell viability, proliferation, autophagy, and apoptosis, as well as the expression of cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion proteins. In addition, mTOR pathway activity and responsiveness to mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin and ipatasertib) and chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin) were assessed. The bioprinted TMSs remained viable for up to 3 weeks and developed a tissue-like architecture characterized by heterogeneous marker expression (β-catenin, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, fibronectin, and syndecan) and complex cellular organization. Compared with 2D monolayer cultures, 3D TMSs exhibited reduced mTOR signaling activity, which led to significantly decreased sensitivity to mTOR inhibition. These findings indicate that 3D bioprinted breast cancer models recapitulate key structural and signaling features of in situ tumors more accurately than 2D systems, highlighting their potential value for preclinical drug testing and mechanistic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.