ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
The impact of COVID-19 on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of end-of-life care and decision making amongst doctors in South African Emergency Departments.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented strain on emergency departments (EDs), altering approaches to end-of-life (EOL) care. This study assessed its impact on emergency clinicians' knowledge, decision making and attitudes towards EOL care in Johannesburg, South Africa. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among doctors working in five state-funded Johannesburg EDs between July 2024 and January 2025. A self-administered questionnaire assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices across three peripandemic time periods: pre-COVID-19, during COVID-19 and post-COVID-19. Participants included doctors with ED experience both before and after the pandemic, and ED/ critical care experience during the pandemic. The survey included 10 knowledge items and Likert-scale assessments of attitudes and practices. Changes over time and associations with demographics were analysed, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Ninety-three doctors participated (median ED experience 5 years). Only 11.8% reported formal EOL training, although median knowledge scores were high (9/10, IQR9-10). Attitudes towards EOL decision-making shifted significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, with clinical prognostic factors (e.g., likelihood of survival, poor neurological outcomes, quality of life) increasing in importance, while medicolegal and religious considerations remained stable. Reported practices of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic and declined thereafter, suggesting an association with pandemic related pressures. In contrast, symptom management improved across all time points and EOL discussions became more frequent during and after the pandemic, particularly regarding prognosis and family involvement. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the ethical complexity importance of EOL care in South African EDs, alongside sustained improvements in communication and symptom management. These findings support the need for targeted EOL care training and system-level policy development to strengthen care in resourced constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.