Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253884›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Mapping the landscape of state Medicaid policy.

Grace Beals, Marissa Rivera, Jamila Michener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace BealsGovernment Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-9049
Marissa RiveraGovernment Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6165-9386
Jamila MichenerGovernment Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-442X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Federal changes in Medicaid policy are the subject of significant national attention and debate. In contrast, state-level Medicaid policies are more of a black box: difficult to keep track of and much less salient. These disparate attention and information contexts obscure the important ways that federal and state Medicaid policies compare. Methods: We present original policy data that identify nearly 4000 proposed state Medicaid bills from 2018 to 2022. Results: We show that the recent and ongoing federal emphases on reducing Medicaid expenditures are misaligned with state policy efforts. Moreover, although current federal policy changes have openly eschewed a focus on equity, we find that state-level policies with an explicit emphasis on equity fare equally well (in terms of passage) as those without such an emphasis. Far from cutting their programs, states have consistently expanded access to Medicaid. When state Medicaid policy focuses on equity, it remains politically feasible. Conclusion: Altogether, we find that many state Medicaid programs innovate and expand in attempts to offer vital services to their constituents. In an era of federal policy retrenchment, this raises concerns about states' capacity to continue such efforts.

Indexed as

equityfederalismMedicaidstate policy

Identifiers

PMID42253884
PMCPMC13234937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.