ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Preventing Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesion Formation Following Operative Hysteroscopy.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Hydrogels for Intrauterine Adhesion Therapy and Endometrial Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of intrauterine hyaluronic acid (HA) gel application in preventing postoperative intrauterine adhesion formation following operative hysteroscopy. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted at a tertiary referral center and included women who underwent operative hysteroscopy between January 2024 and December 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative management: those who received intrauterine hyaluronic acid gel application and those who did not receive any adhesion barrier. All patients underwent follow-up evaluation with second-look hysteroscopy between 30 days and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesion formation. Secondary outcomes included adhesion type, cavity involvement according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification, and menstrual pattern changes. Results: A total of 77 patients were included in the final analysis, including 34 patients in the HA gel group and 43 patients in the control group. Postoperative intrauterine adhesions were detected in 22 patients (28.6%). The incidence of adhesion formation was significantly lower in the HA gel group compared with the control group (8.8% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.001). Adhesions observed in the HA gel group were predominantly filmy in nature, and all observed adhesions involved less than one-third of the uterine cavity. Improvement in menstrual patterns was observed in all patients in the HA gel group and in 78.9% of patients in the control group. The use of hyaluronic acid gel resulted in an absolute risk reduction of 34.4% and a relative risk reduction of approximately 80% in adhesion formation. Conclusion: Intrauterine application of hyaluronic acid gel following operative hysteroscopy was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions and descriptively milder adhesion characteristics. HA gel may represent a useful adjunct for adhesion prevention; however, larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.