ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
The ASME-speller: 30-class auditory brain-computer interface speller using stream segregation and the QWERTY layout.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study presents the ASME-speller, a novel 30-class auditory brain-computer interface (BCI) speller system that combines auditory stream segregation with the familiar QWERTY keyboard layout to facilitate intuitive and visionfree communication. Methods: In the ASME-speller, three distinct auditory streams are presented simultaneously, each corresponding to a row on the QWERTY keyboard. The low-, middle-, and high-frequency streams represent the bottom, middle, and top rows, respectively. Within each stream, alphabet letters and selected symbols are repeatedly presented as spoken voice stimuli. Users are instructed to focus exclusively on the stream corresponding to the row containing the target letter and to selectively attend to that letter within the stream. By leveraging the QWERTY layout and auditory stream segregation, the proposed approach enables users to restrict their attentional focus to a subset of letters by directing selective attention to auditory streams, while the mapping between QWERTY rows and stream pitch facilitates intuitive letter selection. We conducted online experiments with ten healthy participants to evaluate system performance. Results: The ASME-speller achieved an average classification accuracy of 0.76 and an average information transfer rate (ITR) of 2.16 bits/min. Excluding one participant whose EEG data contained excessive artifacts, these values improved to 0.84 and 2.40 bits/min, respectively. Post-hoc analyses further examined the effects of preprocessing parameters, classification pipelines, and early stopping strategies. Among four pipelines tested, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) combined with dynamic stopping demonstrated the most robust performance across participants (accuracy of 0.80 and ITR of 4.76 bits/min). For the best participant, a deep learning model (EEGNet4,2) with dynamic stopping achieved accuracy of 1.0 with ITR of 14.44 bits/min. Discussion: Compared to previous auditory BCI spellers, the ASME-speller demonstrates performance comparable to existing systems, while offering advantages in terms of simplicity, requiring only standard headphones and no visual support. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of the ASME-speller and pave the way toward practical auditory BCI applications for communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.