ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Neural predictors of psychotherapy response in borderline personality disorder: a mini review of neuroimaging studies.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although psychotherapy is the first-line treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), a substantial set of patients shows limited improvement, underscoring the need for reliable predictors to guide personalized interventions. Neurobiological markers have emerged as promising candidates, yet a comprehensive synthesis of neural predictors is lacking. This mini-review examined six structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies investigating pre-treatment brain features associated with psychotherapy response in BPD. The studies varied in design, including structural MRI and task-based functional MRI paradigms assessing emotion regulation, inhibitory control, autobiographical memory, affective interference, and attachment-related processing. They also differed in therapy type (primarily Dialectical Behavior Therapy), outcome measures (ranging from global symptom severity, affective instability, emotion regulation, to impulsivity), and analytic approaches, including univariate approaches and machine-learning predictive models, using region-of-interest or whole-brain analyses. Across studies, converging evidence highlights the salience network, particularly the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex, as central predictor of treatment response. Despite promising findings, current evidence is constrained by small samples, heterogeneous methodologies, and limited follow-up. Larger, longitudinal, and multimodal studies are needed to establish robust neurobiological predictors and support the development of precision-tailored treatments for BPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.