ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Neural correlates of risky monetary decision-making impacting others.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Risky decision making can involve potential serious harms to the self and other people. Significant work has focused on the former category, illustrating a variety of neural correlates with risk taking, highlighting valuation, outcome uncertainty, and other cognitive processes related to feedback learning. Behavioral evidence suggests people are generally more risk tolerant in decisions on behalf of others, but it is less clear if this reflects similar value computation or a distinct influence of social cognition. Here, we replicate and extend limited previous work to address that question. Methods: Adults ( Results: Individuals were more willing to risk financial loss to others compared to themselves. In this same contrast, temporoparietal junction and posterior cingulate hemodynamic responses were elevated. Ventral striatum engagement was higher when risk of financial loss was to the self. Additional regions were found in a whole-brain analysis examining the effect of Risk/Reward Allocation, including in anterior insula and temporoparietal junction. Discussion: Overall, these results suggest decisions about financial risks to others involve engagement in social cognitive processes beyond typical valuation/uncertainty modulation. These processes are particularly sensitive to risk/reward allocation, which suggests potential for future studies to evaluate this allocation framing as a tool for reducing risks to others in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.