ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Articulatory effort modulates speech adaptation to auditory perturbations.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech sensorimotor adaptation is typically partial, varies across individuals, and often saturates under large auditory perturbations. While sensory and phonological factors have been proposed to explain this variability, the role of motor effort and its influence on the compensatory response remain largely unexplored. Our study examined whether the physical effort involved in producing compensatory gestures influences both the overall magnitude of adaptation and the perturbation level at which this adaptation begins to saturate. Native French speakers produced the minimal pair /ne/-/nø/ while receiving gradually upshifted second-formant (F2) feedback (0-50%) in two conditions using deformable lip tubes: a very flexible tube (FLT) and a more rigid tube (RLT), both allowing lip rounding but increasing the effort required to achieve it. Compensation was quantified acoustically (F2 decrease) and physiologically (increase in EMG activity of the orbicularis oris muscle) in 21 participants. F2 compensation increased with perturbation level but saturated earlier and at a lower magnitude when articulation required greater effort (RLT). Lip-muscle activity showed a similar nonlinear pattern, with saturation in EMG and F2 occurring at comparable perturbation levels. Variations in F1 suggested that most participants initially relied on increased lip rounding, but some shifted at higher perturbation levels toward another articulatory strategy very likely to involve tongue backing. These results show that speech adaptation depends not only on error monitoring and correction but is also constrained by the physical effort required to produce compensatory movements, which both limits the magnitude of adaptation and influences the selection of compensatory strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.