ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Correlation of Scaphotrapezoid Contact Pressures With Degree of Trapezoid Resection: Does Eliminating Contact Matter?
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) arthritis is the third most common hand arthritis in the United States. In the setting of thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty, varying degrees of partial excision of the proximal trapezoid have been suggested. We sought to quantify how much resection was adequate to prevent scaphotrapezoid (ST) impingement through a biomechanical cadaveric study. It was hypothesized that the commonly suggested 2 mm of trapezoid excision would be inadequate to prevent ST impingement in all planes of motion. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were screened for normal STT morphology for inclusion. Each extremity was prepared for testing with the forearm transfixed in neutral rotation, then mounted in a servohydraulic testing system. A motion capture system was used to evaluate the range of motion. A dorsal approach to the thumb carpometacarpal was performed with trapezium excision. A Tekscan sensor was secured within the ST joint, and the following conditions were tested: 45N in terminal flexion, 45N in terminal extension, 89N in terminal extension, and 45N in radial deviation. Flexion and extension loads were applied axially in line with the forearm, and radial deviation was applied 90° tangentially to the forearm. Tests were repeated after incremental 2-mm trapezoid resections up to 6 mm.Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests for nonparametric comparisons. Results: No significant ST joint contact occurred in extension at any resection depth. A statistically significant decrease in contact pressures required a 4-mm resection ( Conclusions: Significant reduction in ST contact pressures in flexion and radial deviation requires 4-6 mm of resection. There is no significant ST impingement in wrist extension. Achieving impingement-free motion in flexion and radial deviation requires more resection than previously believed. Clinical relevance: If the goal of ST arthritis management through partial trapezoid resection is impingement-free range of motion, then at least 4-6 mm of trapezoid must be resected. Our data may support investigating alternative interventions for the management of ST arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.