ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Optimal Timing of Drain Removal in Patients with Prolonged High Output Following Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In tissue expander breast reconstruction, surgeons are faced with a dilemma when drain output remains high for a prolonged period of time: removal may predispose to seroma, whereas retention may predispose to infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of drain removal in this patient population. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction. Groups were compared: control (group 1); prolonged (>1 mo) high drain output (>30 mL/d) with drains removed when output met criteria (<30 mL/d) (group 2); patients with high drain output with drains removed before drains met output criteria and before 1 month postoperatively (group 3); and patients with high drain output with drains removed after 1 month postoperatively (group 4). Results: A total of 175 patients were analyzed. Group 1 (n = 143) and group 2 (n = 6) had similar rates of complications (11.9% versus 16.7%, respectively; Conclusions: Decisions about the optimal timing for drain removal in patients undergoing tissue expander breast reconstruction with prolonged high drain output should be guided by volume of output rather than the duration of time the drain has been in place.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.