ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Pancreatic tail solid pseudopapillary neoplasm mimicking mucinous cystic neoplasm: case report and literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare, low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors, predominantly affecting young females, and often pose diagnostic challenges due to overlapping radiological features with other cystic pancreatic lesions. Case presentation: A 30-year-old female presented with a 2-month history of left upper abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 7-cm multicystic lesion in the pancreatic tail, suggestive of a mucinous cystic neoplasm. She underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, and histopathology confirmed an SPN. The postoperative course was uneventful, with good recovery at a 1-month follow-up. Discussion: This case underscores the limitations of imaging in differentiating SPNs from other cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Despite adjuncts such as endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration, a definitive diagnosis often relies on histopathological evaluation. Given their malignant potential, surgical resection remains the mainstay of management. Conclusion: SPNs should be considered in young females presenting with pancreatic cystic lesions. Early surgical intervention enables a definitive diagnosis and is associated with an excellent prognosis and favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.