ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Electroacupuncture for girdle sensation following spinal cord injury as a false localizing sign: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Girdle sensation is a distressing false localizing sign that may occur following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), often presenting as circumferential trunk constriction with burning pain and sleep disturbance. Effective treatments for this condition remain limited. Case summary: This case series describes two male patients (aged 52 and 45 years) who presented with girdle sensation following spinal cord injury. As symptoms were refractory to conventional pharmacological management with antispasmodics and analgesics, both patients underwent electroacupuncture (EA) at bilateral LU7 (Lieque), SI3 (Houxi), LI10 (Shousanli), and LI11 (Quchi). Symptom intensity and associated sleep disturbances were quantified utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Sleep Dysfunction Rating Scale (SDRS). Outcomes: Both patients reported immediate relief from the girdle sensation following the initial electroacupuncture (EA) session. Over the two-week treatment course, VAS and SDRS scores decreased progressively, reflecting sustained pain reduction and enhanced sleep. No adverse events were observed. Conclusion: This case series suggests that electroacupuncture is a promising non-pharmacological therapy for managing post-SCI girdle sensation. However, rigorous randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate its clinical efficacy and elucidate the underlying neuromodulatory mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.