Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253608›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Estimating fMRI timescale maps.

Gabriel Riegner, Samuel Davenport, Bradley Voytek, Armin Schwartzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel RiegnerHalicioğlu Data Science Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Samuel DavenportDivision of Biostatistics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Bradley VoytekHalicioğlu Data Science Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Armin SchwartzmanHalicioğlu Data Science Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain activity unfolds over hierarchical timescales that reflect how brain regions integrate and process information, linking functional and structural organization. While timescale studies are prevalent, existing estimation methods rely on the restrictive assumption of exponentially decaying temporal autocorrelation and only provide point estimates without standard errors, limiting statistical inference. In this paper, we formalize and evaluate two methods for mapping timescales in resting-state fMRI: a time-domain fit of an autoregressive (AR1) model and an autocorrelation-domain fit of an exponential decay model. Rather than assuming exponential autocorrelation decay, we define timescales by projecting the fMRI time series onto these approximating models, requiring only stationarity and mixing conditions while incorporating robust standard errors to account for model misspecification. We introduce theoretical properties of timescale estimators and show parameter recovery in realistic simulations, as well as applications to fMRI from the Human Connectome Project. Comparatively, the time-domain method produces more accurate estimates under model misspecification, remains computationally efficient for high-dimensional fMRI data, and yields maps aligned with known functional brain organization. In this work, we show valid statistical inference on fMRI timescale maps, and provide Python implementations of all methods.

Indexed as

autocorrelation-domain nonlinear modelfunctional brain organizationhuman connectome projectstatistical inferencetime-domain linear modeluncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID42253608
PMCPMC13237991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.