Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Knowledge graph as an adaptive cognitive scaffolding: enhancing learning outcomes in CLIL-based international trade practice course under the OBE framework.

Xiaoqin Yin, Fang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoqin Yin *School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fang Chen *School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by the digital transformation of higher education, innovative instructional methodologies in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) are pivotal for developing interdisciplinary foreign language professionals. To address the dual cognitive load inherent in CLIL environments, this study proposes a Knowledge Graph (KG)-driven adaptive scaffolding framework and evaluates its effectiveness within an Outcome-Based Education (OBE) paradigm. Adopting an educational design research methodology, we implemented a 16-week intervention targeting 51 undergraduate English majors at a Chinese application-oriented university. To assess the model's efficacy in promoting disciplinary and linguistic gains, the study utilized a multi-dimensional evaluation matrix and a normalized Course Objective (CO) attainment matrix aligned with the professional accreditation standards. Quantitative analyses revealed substantial improvements in domain-specific literacy (overall CO attainment = 0.78), with particularly notable performance in disciplinary knowledge (CO1 = 0.81) and language proficiency (CO2 = 0.82). However, a "knowledge-action gap" persisted in the development of practical skills (CO3 = 0.73). These findings suggest that while KG demonstrates exceptional strength in conceptual scaffolding, additional immersive simulations are required to cultivate high-order procedural knowledge. By addressing these cognitive and practical dimensions, the study provides a scalable framework for integrating KG-driven adaptive scaffolding into New Liberal Arts curricula, while also identifying the limits of its scaffolding approach in fostering practical expertise.

Indexed as

adaptive cognitive scaffoldingCLILcognitive loadknowledge graphOBE

Identifiers

PMID42253587
PMCPMC13236954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.