Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Algorithmic management and employee innovation: unveiling the mediating mechanisms of perceived fit, perceived control and job crafting.

Rustem Korabayev, Zhen Fan, Ling Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rustem KorabayevSchool of Management, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, China.
Zhen FanFaculty of Economics and Business, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ling PengSchool of Management, Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of digital technologies, algorithmic management has become an important management model in modern organizations. Drawing on the Job Demands-Resources theory and Self-Determination Theory, this study constructs a chain mediating model to explore how algorithmic management influences employee innovation performance through perceived fit, perceived control, and job crafting. Based on a survey and empirical analysis of 353 employees in high-technology enterprises, the results show that algorithmic management has positive effects on both perceived fit and perceived control, but the effect on perceived fit is significantly stronger than that on perceived control. Moreover, perceived fit and perceived control mediate the relationship between algorithmic management and innovation performance, with job crafting serving as a chain mediator in both pathways. Notably, the mediating effect of perceived control is very weak. This study reveals that the resource-driven mechanism of algorithmic management is significantly stronger than its demand-constraint mechanism. These findings provide theoretical insights and practical implications for organizations to better leverage algorithmic management to foster employee innovation.

Indexed as

algorithmic managementinnovation performancejob craftingperceived controlperceived fit

Identifiers

PMID42253579
PMCPMC13233254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.