ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Algorithmic management and employee innovation: unveiling the mediating mechanisms of perceived fit, perceived control and job crafting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of digital technologies, algorithmic management has become an important management model in modern organizations. Drawing on the Job Demands-Resources theory and Self-Determination Theory, this study constructs a chain mediating model to explore how algorithmic management influences employee innovation performance through perceived fit, perceived control, and job crafting. Based on a survey and empirical analysis of 353 employees in high-technology enterprises, the results show that algorithmic management has positive effects on both perceived fit and perceived control, but the effect on perceived fit is significantly stronger than that on perceived control. Moreover, perceived fit and perceived control mediate the relationship between algorithmic management and innovation performance, with job crafting serving as a chain mediator in both pathways. Notably, the mediating effect of perceived control is very weak. This study reveals that the resource-driven mechanism of algorithmic management is significantly stronger than its demand-constraint mechanism. These findings provide theoretical insights and practical implications for organizations to better leverage algorithmic management to foster employee innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.