Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253560›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Whose helping hurts? Source and construct differences in unhelpful workplace social support.

Anne Jeannette Ponsteen, Kristoffer Holm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne Jeannette PonsteenDepartment of Urban Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kristoffer HolmDepartment of Urban Studies, Malmö University, Center for Work Life Studies, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although workplace social support is typically viewed as a beneficial job resource, it can also function as an interpersonal stressor when perceived as unhelpful or subtly devaluing. This study aims to advance understanding of how unhelpful support operates at the workplace by studying three aspects of the construct: (1) providing the first empirical comparison between unhelpful workplace social support (UWSS) and dysfunctional social support (DSS), (2) examining whether unhelpful workplace social support (UWSS) can be meaningfully distinguished by source (coworkers vs. supervisors), and (3) testing organization-based self-esteem (OBSE) as a mechanism linking these forms of unhelpful help to negative employee outcomes, including the novel outcome of turnover intentions. Methods: Survey data from 157 working adults were analyzed using factor- and mediation analyses. Results: Results indicate that dysfunctional social support is empirically distinct from unhelpful workplace social support and emerges as a slightly stronger predictor of organizational frustration, counterproductive work behavior, and turnover intentions. Significant indirect associations Discussion: These findings underscore the impact of subtle, low-threshold, normalized forms of unhelpful support for organizations.

Indexed as

dysfunctional social supportorganizational-based self-esteemstress-as-offence to-self theoryturnover intentionsunhelpful workplace social support

Identifiers

PMID42253560
PMCPMC13235982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.