ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Not all distress is the same: profiles of stress, anxiety, and depression among university students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thinking as Relational Process and Pattern in Semiotic Cultural Psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The psychological distress among university students has become more and more common, but the manifestations at the individual level are very heterogeneous. This study was guided by cognitive appraisal theory, which took a personcentered approach to investigate joint patterns of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression in university students and their relationships with sleep quality. Methods: A total of 764 undergraduate students from a comprehensive university in central China participated in this study. Latent profile analysis was conducted to classify distinct psychological distress profiles of participants. Demographic characteristics and sleep quality indicators were further analyzed as relevant correlates of the identified profiles. Results: Three latent profiles included a Resilient profile (41.0%) with low stress appraisals and emotional symptoms, an Uncontrollability-Depressive profile (47.9%) with high uncontrollability appraisals and depressive symptoms, and a Tension-Anxious profile (11.1%) with high tension appraisals and anxiety symptoms. These profiles varied not only in terms of the severity of distress overall, but also in terms of configurational patterns of stress appraisals and emotional reactions. Additional analyses indicated that the quality of sleep strongly predicted membership in a particular profile and functional outcomes related to sleep, and worse sleep always corresponded to higher-risk profiles. On the contrary, there were no independent predictive effects of demographic variables after controlling for the effect of sleep quality. Discussion: This study emphasizes the heterogeneity of psychological distress among university students and the importance of a profile-based approach by combining cognitive appraisal processes and functional outcomes. The results highlight the configurational heterogeneity of student distress and imply sleep as an effective and cost-effective stratified screening and early intervention tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.