ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Rethinking CPR training: when the "man" in manikin affects performance, a randomized crossover simulation study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Women are less likely to receive bystander or in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) than men and have lower survival rates following cardiac arrest. Current CPR training relies heavily on manikins that represent white, lean, male-presenting bodies. This study investigates whether manikin sex influences CPR performance using simulated cardiac arrest scenarios. Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover simulation trial of 52 internal medicine residents who completed two ventricular fibrillation arrest scenarios using male-bodied and female-bodied manikins in alternating order (1:1 allocation to female-first vs male-first) separated by a 4‑h washout period. The primary outcome was time from ventricular fibrillation onset to defibrillation and secondary outcomes included time to compressions, time to pad placement, time to recognition of ventricular fibrillation, and CPR quality metrics (depth, rate, and compression fraction). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models controlling for participant sex and experience. Results: Participants in the female-first condition demonstrated delayed time to defibrillation (28.05, Conclusions: CPR performance was inferior when the female manikin was encountered first, with an asymmetric improvement pattern suggesting presentation order alone does not fully explain the gap. Early and routine female manikin representation in CPR education may improve cognitive readiness and attenuate sex-based disparities in resuscitation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.