Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253463›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2026

Effect of Using Personalized Estimates of Diabetes Risk During Primary Care Visits for People With Prediabetes.

Natalia Olchanski, Christine E Skiro, Kristen Sonon, Sarah Kaus, Ericka C Holmstrand, Elizabeth L Ciemins, John K Cuddeback, Francis R Colangelo, David M Kent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalia OlchanskiCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-8166
Christine E SkiroHighmark Health Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Kristen SononHighmark Health Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Sarah KausHighmark Health Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Ericka C HolmstrandHighmark Health Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Elizabeth L CieminsAmerican Medical Group Association (AMGA) Alexandria Virginia USA.
John K CuddebackAmerican Medical Group Association (AMGA) Alexandria Virginia USA.
Francis R ColangeloPremier Medical Associates, Allegheny Health Network Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
David M KentPredictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To assess acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of incorporating individualized risk prediction into clinical assessment, decision making, and communication of risk of type 2 diabetes, with and without preventive interventions, in patients with prediabetes. Methods: We integrated a prediction model into the clinical workflow at a U.S. health care organization. We conducted patient and provider focus groups and pre- and post-dissemination surveys among 2500 patients with prediabetes who had primary care visits between May 2018 and December 2019. We compared rates of progression to type 2 diabetes at 3 years between the intervention group and a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who received usual care. Results: Prior to implementing the predictive model, 41.6% of providers and 63.8% of patients felt confident or very confident in their ability to estimate the risk of progression to diabetes for individual patients. After personalized risk information was made available, this increased to 92.8% for providers and 66.9% for patients. People with prediabetes who had a primary care visit where their care team had access to personal risk of developing type 2 diabetes assessed by the EHR-based prediction model were significantly less likely to progress to diabetes within 3 years, compared to a propensity-score-matched cohort who received usual care in the same health system without individualized risk estimates (19.5% vs. 27.6%, Conclusions: Used at the point of care during a primary care visit, the EHR-based diabetes risk calculator helped providers prioritize patients for diabetes preventive interventions, facilitated communication, and improved health outcomes among patients with prediabetes.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportclinical predictive modeldiabetes preventiondiabetes prevention program (DPP)heterogeneity of treatment effectmetforminprediabetesprimary caretype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42253463
PMCPMC13240528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.