ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Microneedling for Melasma: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Effects and Safety of Radiofrequency Microneedling for the Management of Melasma: A Retrospective Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melasma is a chronic, relapsing hyperpigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat, particularly in Fitzpatrick skin types III-V, where energy-based devices frequently induce postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) has emerged as a promising alternative because it targets dermal pathology while minimizing epidermal injury. Systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic rationale of RFMN for melasma. A PRISMA 2020 compliant search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS (2014-2025) identified clinical studies evaluating RFMN alone or in combination therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Across 12 included studies, RFMN consistently improved Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) or modified MASI scores and melanin indices, with effects maintained up to 6 months. Histological evidence demonstrated reductions in dermal senescence markers and partial restoration of basement-membrane integrity. RFMN also showed a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of PIH in darker phototypes. Combination treatment, particularly with low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser produced greater pigment reduction than monotherapy. RFMN is an effective and safe modality for melasma, offering advantages over pigment-directed lasers by addressing dermal mechanisms and limiting PIH risk. It may serve as a first-line energy-based therapy. Level of Evidence:3 (Therapeutic) For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.