Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253396›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2026

National Cancer Control Programmes in Europe in 2024: State of Play and Alignment with the European Guide for Quality NCCPs.

Marjeta Kuhar, Tit Albreht, Polona Kastelic, Ana Molina-Barceló, Oscar García Sauret, Marjetka Jelenc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marjeta KuharNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva ulica 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3730-5003
Tit AlbrehtNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva ulica 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-4381
Polona KastelicNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva ulica 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1730-6179
Ana Molina-BarcelóFISABIO - Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana, Avenida Cataluña 21, 46020 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-6475
Oscar García SauretFISABIO - Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana, Avenida Cataluña 21, 46020 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6862-1925
Marjetka JelencNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva ulica 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0515-1970

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: National Cancer Control Programmes (NCCPs) are essential policy documents guiding national cancer control planning. Their existence and quality are crucial for reducing cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality, and for improving the quality of life of people with cancer and the population. The main aim of the present research, conducted within OriON Joint Action (2024-2025), was to explore and analyse the state of play, type, duration, evaluation, and quality of NCCPs across the European Union (EU) and selected countries, with a focus on the inclusion of key elements outlined in the European Guide for Quality NCCPs (Guide). Methods: A structured survey was prepared, validated, and carried out in 2024 across 34 countries, including EU Member States, Iceland, Montenegro, Norway, Turkey, and Ukraine. The results were analysed and presented in tables and figures. Descriptive analysis using frequencies and percentages was conducted. Results: The response rate was 100%. Of the 34 participating countries, 31 reported having an NCCP or equivalent cancer control document in 2024. Most countries had 1 comprehensive document, while 9 prepared multiple documents. The majority were defined as programmes and/or strategies, followed by plans and policies. In terms of quality, as recommended by the Guide, only 6 countries fully incorporated all suggested elements into their NCCPs. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that most European countries recognise the significant challenge posed by cancer as a major public health problem and have developed NCCPs or equivalent cancer control documents. However, in terms of quality, there remains considerable room for improvement.

Indexed as

CancerCancer controlEuropeNational Cancer Control ProgrammesOncologyOriON Joint Action

Identifiers

PMID42253396
PMCPMC13236479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.