ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Proteomic profiling of olfactory exfoliates from people with subjective cognitive complaints reveal networks of olfactory biomarkers of cognitive performance.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Partly due to the inaccessibility of olfactory brain regions vulnerable to early Alzheimer's Disease (AD) for repeated sampling, proteomic networks underlying progressive cognitive decline remain poorly understood. The olfactory mucosa (OM), an accessible part of the olfactory system, reflects central nervous system physiology and pathology, and represents a promising site for biomarker discovery. This study aimed to identify olfactory proteomic markers and pathways associated with performance in the logical memory II recognition (LM II_recog) subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale among older adults with subjective cognitive complaints. Methods: Clinical, olfactory, and cognitive assessments were conducted on 108 adults aged 55-85 years from the Washington, DC region. Nasal exfoliates were sampled from the upper nasal cavities, and protein extracts from these samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS). Linear regression with false discovery rate (FDR) correction ( Results: A total of 137 proteins meeting the FDR Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using OM-derived proteomics to identify molecular signatures associated with cognitive performance and highlights the OM as a potential site for non-invasive biomarker discovery. These findings provide a foundation for future studies integrating OM profiling with established AD biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.