Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253357›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2026

The application value of frailty assessment tools in the perioperative period: A narrative review.

Haozhou Shen, Manling Ju, Xinyue Wu, Shanshan Shi, Jie Sun, Mi Tian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haozhou ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.
Manling JuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.
Xinyue WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.
Shanshan ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.
Jie SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.
Mi TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Pain Management and Key Laboratory of Clinical Science and Research, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Southeast University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210009, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserves and multisystem dysfunction, which markedly elevates the risk of postoperative complications and delayed functional recovery, and increases mortality. Amid the rapidly aging global population, the proportion of surgical patients with frailty is steadily increasing, presenting substantial challenges for perioperative management. Conventional preoperative assessment tools have significant limitations in identifying frailty and predicting surgical outcomes, while the clinical utility of emerging assessment methods requires further systematic evaluation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative frailty assessment tools. It critically examines recent advances from 2019 to 2025 and incorporates seminal foundational studies that established core concepts and validated key early instruments. The analysis evaluates their comparative efficacy, clinical utility in perioperative care, and existing limitations, aiming to offer scholars and clinicians a balanced and insightful perspective rather than an exhaustive summary of all available evidence.

Indexed as

Aging populationFrailtyFrailty assessment toolsPerioperative periodPostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42253357
PMCPMC13234458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.