ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2026
Research Advances in Timing of Anticoagulant Therapy Following Cardioembolic Stroke.
Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardioembolic stroke primarily results from thromboembolism caused by cardiac conditions such as atrial fibrillation, characterised by high recurrence rates, high rates of disability, and high mortality. Anticoagulation therapy is a key measure for the prevention of stroke recurrence, though the timing of its initiation remains debated, requiring a balance between the risk of thromboembolic recurrence and the risk of bleeding. The widely adopted "1-3-6-12-day rule" is based on expert consensus but lacks support from high-level evidence. In recent years, multiple randomized controlled trials (such as TIMING, ELAN, OPTIMAS, and START) have demonstrated that for patients with mild-to-moderate cardioembolic stroke, early initiation (within 2-4 days after stroke) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is not only safe but also significantly reduces the risk of early recurrence, without increasing the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. In particular, the recently completed individual participant data meta-analysis (CATALYST) has provided robust evidence for early anticoagulation. Unlike previous reviews that have focused solely on the timing of anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, this review provides a critical appraisal of the evidence gaps for severe stroke and post-reperfusion populations, a practical comparison of individual DOACs to guide drug selection, and a summary of management principles for other cardioembolic sources (mechanical valves, infective endocarditis, patent foramen ovale, left ventricular thrombus, and atrial flutter). This review summarises the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardioembolic stroke, clinical strategies for anticoagulation timing, characteristics of different anticoagulant agents and their indications for use. It emphasises the importance of individualised treatment and indicates that future research should further clarify the optimal timing of anticoagulation in patients with severe stroke and those undergoing reperfusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.