Articlenpj veterinary sciences2026
Stakeholder engagement as a valuable tool to improve the relevance of research regarding framework development.
Article in npj veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a stakeholder engagement process conducted as part of a larger research project to develop a new framework to support the adoption of preventive medicine practices on ruminant farms. Stakeholder engagement enhances research relevance by aligning it with the needs of end users. While common in human healthcare, it is less prevalent in veterinary medicine. Stakeholders engaged in this work included future end users-veterinarians and livestock farmers. A combination of approaches was utilised, including in-person and online group discussions and individual conversations. Stakeholder contributions significantly shaped the research-both the content and structure of the framework, as well as the methods used to develop it. Their involvement improved the framework's practical relevance and usability, increasing the likelihood of future adoption. The findings demonstrate that stakeholder engagement is not only valuable but also feasible within veterinary research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.