Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253314›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026

Comparative evaluation of handwriting recognition by large language models (LLMs) in interpreting handwritten medication lists.

Tom G Jacobs, Laize Sílvia Dos Anjos Botas Beca, Paul D van der Linden, Merel van Nuland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tom G JacobsDepartment of Pharmacy, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Laize Sílvia Dos Anjos Botas BecaLurio University, Pharmacy Department, Nampula, Mozambique.
Paul D van der LindenDepartment of Pharmacy, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Merel van NulandDepartment of Pharmacy, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Handwritten bedside medication lists remain common in healthcare, especially in low-resource countries, presenting challenges for digitization and automated safety checks. The introduction of large-language models may present an opportunity to facilitate digitization of handwritten medication lists. Objective: This study evaluated the accuracy of three GPT-based language models in recognizing handwritten medication lists, presented in Dutch. Methods: Thirty-three participants transcribed a list of 10 medications with dosage and administration instructions. These lists were processed by each model and scored for correct medication name, dosage, frequency, and route. The effect of writer characteristics on LLM performance was assessed using the Mann-Whitney Results: GPT 4.1 achieved the highest accuracy, followed by GPT4o, both outperforming GPT4o-mini ( Conclusion: GPT-based optical character recognition showed potential for scalable digitization of handwritten prescriptions, however, human oversight remains essential to ensure medication safety. Future research should validate performance in real-world, multilingual settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigitizationLarge language modelMedication listPharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42253314
PMCPMC13241658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.