ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
MRI-based morphometric analysis of the patellofemoral joint: diagnostic modeling of knee pathologies in adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate whether routinely measured MRI-based patellofemoral joint morphometric parameters can support diagnostic modeling of selected adolescent knee pathologies and to compare a conventional multivariable logistic regression baseline with machine-learning approaches. Methods: This retrospective single-center pilot diganostic modeling study included 168 adolescents (97 girls, 71 boys, mean age 15.5 ± 1.7 years) who underwent knee MRI between January 2018 and December 2024 because of anterior knee pain or suspected patellofemoral structural abnormality. Thirteen patellofemoral morphometric parameters were measured by two radiologists. Three binary MRI endpoints were modeled: composite chondromalacia, a composite endpoint of ACL injury or patellar bone bruise, and patellar retinacular lesion. Baseline multivariable logistic regression was compared with machine-learning approaches using chronological training, validation, and test splits. Additional gradient-boosting comparators were evaluated, and uncertainty was quantified using bootstrap confidence intervals on the independent test set. Results: In multivariable logistic regression, no individual continuous morphometric predictor reached statistical significance for any endpoint. After correction of the model-selection procedure, predictive performance proved endpoint-specific rather than uniformly strong. For composite chondromalacia, discrimination remained weak. For the ACL injury/patellar bone bruise composite, machine-learning models showed only modest improvement in point estimates over logistic regression, but confidence intervals for differences crossed zero. The strongest reproducible signal was observed for patellar retinacular lesions. After correction of model selection and bootstrap-based uncertainty estimation, a morphometric-only CatBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.97) and balanced accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.94), while a morphometric-only LightGBM model achieved an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.64-0.97) and balanced accuracy of 0.76 (95% CI 0.59-0.88). Discussion: In adolescents, routine patellofemoral morphometrics do not provide uniformly strong diagnostic discrimination across all MRI-defined knee pathologies studied here. Their most convincing predictive value was observed for patellar retinacular lesions, whereas performance for composite chondromalacia and the ACL injury/patellar bone bruise composite remained limited. These findings support a narrower interpretation of clinical utility and justify further validation in larger external cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.