ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026
Predictive Immunohistochemistry in Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Clinical Utility, Practical Limitations, and Emerging Directions.
Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains a difficult-to-treat biliary malignancy in which therapeutic stratification increasingly depends on predictive biomarkers. Although next-generation sequencing is essential for the detection of targetable genomic alterations, immunohistochemistry (IHC) retains a practical role because it is widely available, rapid, and tissue-sparing. This narrative review summarizes the current and emerging role of predictive IHC in CCA, with emphasis on its clinical utility, interpretative pitfalls, and integration with molecular testing. HER2 and mismatch repair proteins currently represent the most relevant IHC-based markers in routine practice, albeit in selected subsets of patients. By contrast, PD-L1 has clear biological relevance but limited value as a stand-alone treatment selector in CCA, whereas Claudin 18.2 is promising but still investigational. Additional lines of research, including tumor microenvironment profiling, integrin-related pathways, and other theragnostic targets, may further refine patient selection, but these approaches are not yet standardized. Digital image analysis, radiomics, and machine learning are likely to improve quantification and may support future biomarker integration. A practical pathology-oriented approach should prioritize tissue stewardship, conservative interpretation of IHC results, and close coordination with molecular methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.