ArticleMedical physics2026
Toward universal dose prediction: A multi-scale, multi-objective framework for sequential boost radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autonomous radiotherapy planning via agentic orchestration using a multimodal TPS-integrated compound AI platform.Machine learning. Health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSequential boost radiotherapy (RT) poses a challenge in allocating dose across multiple plans while protecting organs at risk (OARs). Clinicians must decide whether OAR sparing should occur primarily in the initial plan, the boost plan(s), or all plans, resulting in a time-intensive, iterative optimization process. PURPOSE: Current dose prediction frameworks are limited to single plans and do not account for complexities introduced by sequential boosts. We propose a multi-plan dose prediction framework that models both individual plan doses and the cumulative plan-sum dose. By integrating the full course's context, this approach may help planners establish optimization objectives with fewer iterative adjustments. Ultimately, this framework aims to enable a versatile dose prediction approach adaptable to any RT course, regardless of treatment site, fractionation scheme, or the number of sequential plans.
methodsWe developed a U-Net-based Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that processes CT images, OARs, PTVs, and dosimetric goals to predict dose distributions for each plan and the plan-sum. It incorporates five pooling layers, skip connections, and a transformer bottleneck to capture global context. Deep supervision is applied in the decoder to encourage robust feature representation at deeper network layers, acting as a form of regularization. The single-plan model used for comparison differs from the multi-plan model in several key ways: (1) it only processes a single treatment plan at a time, (2) plan-sum dosimetric goals are re-scaled to reflect the plan fractions, (3) plan-sum PTVs are omitted, (4) it only predicts plan doses, and (5) plan-sum dose distributions were generated by summing plan dose predictions. Models were trained using a multi-objective loss vector of Mean Squared Error (MSE) for voxel-wise accuracy and Multi-Scale Structural Similarity Index (MS-SSIM) for regional coherence. Loss was averaged across all output levels to encourage global coherence. To improve training stability and ensure that parameter updates benefit both loss objectives, we used a Jacobian descent strategy via the TorchJD package. We collected a site-agnostic dataset of 64 patients that underwent sequential boost RT (38/6/20 training/validation/testing split).
resultsThe multi-plan model and single-plan model were trained to convergence. Evaluation metrics included Mean Absolute Error as a percent of prescription dose (MAE/Rx) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). The multi-plan model achieved statistically significant differences versus the single-plan model in plan dose distributions with MAE/Rx (1.244 ± 0.151% vs. 1.650 ± 0.172%, p < 0.001) and SSIM (0.964 ± 0.005 vs. 0.944 ± 0.009, p < 0.001), and plan-sum dose distributions with MAE/Rx (1.146 ± 0.174% vs. 1.525 ± 0.188%, p < 0.001) and SSIM (0.972 ± 0.006 vs. 0.960 ± 0.006, p < 0.001).
conclusionOur multi-plan dose prediction framework improves voxel-wise accuracy and perceptual consistency by incorporating plan-sum information. Unlike traditional single-plan prediction models, our approach processes data from multiple treatment plans simultaneously, allowing it to consider cumulative dose requirements across the full treatment course. This approach can streamline treatment planning by providing clinicians with an accurate, comprehensive strategy for dose allocation in sequential boost RT. This framework lays the foundation for a universal RT dose prediction model capable of handling any fractionation scheme, disease site, or number of plans, which we plan to demonstrate in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.