ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.