Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42253018›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026

A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour.

Maria Ameel, Tiina Talja, Jaakko Varpula, Tessa Maguire, Michael Daffern, Sanna Blomqvist, Tella Lantta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria AmeelPsychiatry and HUS NRC, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiina TaljaPsychiatry and HUS NRC, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaakko VarpulaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-567X
Tessa MaguireCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-6094
Michael DaffernCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-189X
Sanna BlomqvistDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tella LanttaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-7573

Funding

Finnish Nursing Education Foundation srFinnish Work Environment Fund 210324Nursing Research Center of Helsinki University Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electronic Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression combined with the Aggression Prevention Protocol (eDASA+APP) is a clinical decision support system designed to prevent aggression, reduce coercive practices and promote proactive nursing interventions. It has previously been tested in forensic psychiatry in Australia. Adaptation and feasibility testing are required before implementation in new clinical and linguistic contexts. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of the Finnish version of the eDASA+APP using a mixed methods approach. The study took place in four Finnish mental health inpatient units. Nurses completed an online learning module and used the eDASA+APP for 2 weeks. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on nursing documentation and feasibility. As a result, the eDASA+APP was perceived as easy to use and helpful in establishing a shared process and terminology for aggression prevention. Documentation of risk assessments and preventive interventions increased. The e-learning module was considered adequate. One unit caring for older adults found the risk assessment component less practical. The Finnish eDASA+APP appears feasible and beneficial, supporting a larger implementation in units with adult patients. However, the feasibility testing in older adult services is recommended. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist was followed in reporting this study.

Indexed as

AggressionDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMalePsychiatric NursingRisk Assessmentaggressionclinical decision support systemelectronic health recordsrisk assessmentrisk management

Identifiers

PMID42253018
PMCPMC13244174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.