ArticleCancer cytopathology2026
Successful simplified genomic profiling of cytology specimens using Aspyre Clinical Test for Lung (Tissue).
Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTesting patients with non-small cell lung cancer for actionable variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in accordance with established cancer care guidelines, though limited quantity and quality of tumor tissue often leaves insufficient material for comprehensive testing. Cytopathology specimens obtained through minimally invasive techniques are a potential source of diagnostic material for genomic profiling, though typically challenging to analyze.
methodsA total of 85 DNA or total nucleic acid non-small cell lung cancer samples derived from 45 fine-needle aspirate rinse or pleural fluid samples from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania archive were tested using the Aspyre Clinical Test for Lung (Tissue) in Biofidelity's CAP/CLIA laboratory. All samples were previously characterized by the Oncomine Precision Assay Genexus assay (the orthogonal reference method).
resultsEighty-four of 85 passed Aspyre Lung quality control, one failed. Twenty-six samples were positive for variants in the Aspyre Lung panel: 17 for single nucleotide variants (KRAS, EGFR), three for EGFR insertions/deletions, two for MET exon 14 skipping, and five for gene fusions. Eighty-two of 85 samples were run at standard input levels; three of 85 were run at low input but passed Aspyre Lung controls and include one EGFR exon 20 insertion variant-positive. All results were concordant between methods. Positive Percent Agreement and Negative Percent Agreement were 100%.
conclusionsAspyre Clinical Test for Lung performs effectively on samples derived from fine needle aspirate rinses and pleural fluid. Using these cytology-based specimens for biomarker testing enables pathologists to perform simplified genomic profiling while preserving valuable tissue specimens, potentially reducing the need for additional invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.