Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42252733›Full record

ReviewPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026

Optimizing Use of Real-World Data in Regulatory Decision Making for Medical Devices Used in Surgical Procedures.

Guy Cafri, Florence Bourgeois, Paul Coplan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guy CafriEpidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-429X
Florence BourgeoisDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-4560
Paul CoplanEpidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7078-7780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the United States, the Food and Drug Administration has provided guidance on the contexts in which real-world evidence (RWE) can be used to support regulatory decisions for medical devices.

methodsIn this paper, we review different sources of real-world data (RWD) for medical devices used in surgical procedures and how to optimize the design and analysis features of RWD studies to maximize the strength of RWE. The design and analysis of a study are critical to ensuring that the RWE generated from the RWD can ultimately be used to support a regulatory decision or fulfill a commitment for a medical device. We consider several topics relevant to medical device RWE in our review: misclassification and measurement error, causal inference, and incomplete follow-up.

resultsSome key challenges include indication and outcome misclassification in non‑registry data, tenuous assumptions of single‑arm designs, device‑ and surgeon‑level confounding in comparative studies, and potentially informative loss to follow‑up from censoring (e.g., insurance termination).

conclusionThe review is intended as a guide to researchers and regulators interested in generating or evaluating medical device RWE for regulatory purposes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDevice ApprovalEquipment and SuppliesMedical Device LegislationSurgical EquipmentHumansResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID42252733
PMCPMC13243975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.