ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
An Age-Adapted Co-Design Methodology for Community Health Research Involving Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCo-design is increasingly used in health and social care research, but its application with older adults in community settings may raise methodological challenges. Age-adapted co-design methods are needed to support meaningful participation.
methodsThis study developed and examined an age-adapted co-design methodology in a community setting involving older adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A qualitative approach was adopted, which included exploratory interviews, design probes, clarification interviews, a co-design workshop and evaluation interviews. A total of 24 participants were involved across the study, including older adults with T2DM, community workers, healthcare professionals and extended reality (XR) designers. The methodology was examined in terms of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.
resultsThe methodology was generally found to be acceptable, appropriate and feasible. Participants described the interviews, design probes and workshop activities as manageable and low-burden, particularly when tasks drew on everyday life. Visual materials such as stickers, icons, images and videos, together with simple prompts and reduced writing demands, supported understanding of the research activities, expression and positive emotional engagement. The study also identified challenges related to unfamiliar co-design concepts, the interpretation of some visual tools, workshop duration and practical implementation constraints such as staffing, space, funding, health conditions and time availability. Participant feedback and researcher reflection informed iterative refinements to the materials, workshop preparation, communication strategies and activity format during the study.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the value of an age-adapted, multi-stage co-design methodology for engaging older adults in community health research. The findings highlight the importance of grounding co-design in lived experience, using age-friendly materials and refining methods iteratively. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Older adults with T2DM, community workers, healthcare professionals and XR designers contributed to this study. Their experiences and feedback informed the refinement of the research materials, co-design activities and methodological process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.